Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Lens review

Fairchild 24W shot with the Sigma 15mm fisheye

Having made the switch from the Nikon DX format to the Nikon FX (full frame) format I’ve had to completely renew my arsenal of lenses. This hasn’t been as tough as I thought with many of my DX lenses selling for about the same price as purchasing used FX lenses. I did purchased a number of new lenses, that’s another expensive story completely!

One of the hardest decisions I made was to sell my Nikon 10.5mm fisheye. This is a truly incredible lens when it’s required and I was always amazed at the sharpness, even wide open. I didn’t use it a lot but it produced many memorable images that have been published and raved about. Can’t beat that!

One factor I looked at is that on the Nikon D800, my current camera, using this lens would still produce a 15.3mp image, larger than my previous cameras of 12.3 and 12.4mp. No problem really, I have published books and posters with cameras with fewer megapixels than this and in most cases 15+mp is all you would need, even for a coffee table book double page spread! This is why it was a tough decision. To sell or not to sell?

Having read reviews about full frame fisheyes, I decided the Sigma 15mm f2.8 was a likely candidate for a replacement while the Nikon 16mm f2.8 was not. This is not purely because of cost but because my experience has been that older non digital era Nikon lenses (and most others I expect) just aren’t as sharp with the modern digital cameras. For instance, my new Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 zoom is sharper than my old 85mm fixed focal length lens that I have used for the past 25 years. Wasn’t expecting that!!!
Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye
I checked my usual “used” sources for lenses. Shopping around I found a very clean used example of the Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye (what a mouthful that is!) for $400 shipped and without thinking too much made the purchase. Selling my like new Nikon 10.5mm fisheye wasn’t as easy as I would have thought because I “didn’t have the box”. I guess this is important to the folks that buy and sell routinely but that’s a rant I won’t get into at this time. Anyway, Nikon sold for $360, new used Sigma for $400, can’t complain too much about that.

Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Lens

Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Lens

I have owned the Sigma 15mm for about a month now and typical of this type of lens it has not had a huge amount of use. I have used it enough however to get a really good idea about the strengths and weaknesses. From a physical standpoint, the lens is beautifully made like so many of the higher end Sigma’s. I know there is the odd complaint about the finishes not being durable but one of my previous lenses, the Sigma 50-150mm f2.8, was hauled around the world and responsible for about 80,000 photos.. and while it showed some wear, actually held up better than my Nikon 17-55mm f2.8. I presently own a few other Sigma lenses and have no complaints. The lens is quite a bit bigger than the Nikon 10.5mm but this is to be expected, we are dealing with covering a full frame sensor which means…. bigger and heavier lenses.

How does it perform? Well, it’s a little of a mixed bag here. I’m not convinced the Sigma is quite as sharp in the corners as the Nikon but we do have to remember that we are comparing my new Nikon D800 at 36.4mp with my old Nikon D300 at 12.3mp. It would have been great to have both lenses to compare at the same time but the reality is I’m not an equipment junkie and when I make the decision to switch systems the old stuff goes. If I resize the images to match, the Nikon is OK all the way to the corners while the sigma falls off at the very edges of the corner. It’s really very close and one thing I noticed on the images that I have viewed is that the chromatic aberration on the Sigma is not as pronounced. Overall they both are sharp lenses and could easily produce 16×24 inch prints of very high quality. This is what really matters, both these lenses perform well and produce the quality that even a professional photographer requires. My verdict… I have to give the edge to the Sigma from what I have seen so far. It seems a little sharper overall and sure is a good deal at the price.
Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye
Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye

Related Posts :

  • Most of you realize that for me a lens test doesn't require a fancy lens testing chart or a brick wall. It's not that I don't think that this type ...

  • I'm beginning to feel like an equipment junkie having purchased a couple new (used) lenses recently. One of these, the Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye I hav ...

  • I'm often asked what type of equipment I use or have used. Here we go with the digital era! I've been shooting digital for a number of years, i ...

  • I mentioned a few posts ago that I had just purchased a Nikon 10.5mm fisheye lens. Well, I finally picked it up in Portland and had the opportunit ...

  • The largest museum in the world devoted to glass artist Dale Chihuly opened this past summer at Seattle Center, located at the base of the Seattle ...


2 Responses to “Sigma 15mm f/2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye Lens review”

  1. Lynn Wiles says:

    Seasons Greetings, Kevin. Good to see you back and blogging again. Love the images here. They are magnificent. Hope you are well.

  2. kevin says:

    Hi Lynn,

    Thanks for dropping by and Happy New Year. Time to check out your blog!

Leave a Reply